Controversies and Common Ground in Wild and Domestic Fine Fiber Production in Argentina

This work analyzes possible obstacles to developing new products or old merchandise using an innovative method. It will look into stakeholders of fine fiber and meat from three distinctive socioecological systems. Through case studies, we explore how natural resources management is connected interests, values, knowledge by stakeholders, which include government, the scientific community, people with rural livelihoods. The government vertex national provincial authorities involved decision-makers at level. Scientific-Technological includes researchers INTA, CONICET, Universities. Rural livelihoods livestock keepers, farmers, local traditional knowledge. We address goods services provided two species wild camelids domestic livestock. cases have both similarities differences in their focus common ground controversial spaces. They create complex networks relationships bonds leading diverse outcomes. Top-down bottom-up experiences hold distinct epistemology research consequences, they affect various ways. For livelihoods, meaningful regulations should be endogenous social constructions. However, there are no longitudinal studies on trajectories these studies. Long-term multispecies grazing opportunities available for depends identify flexibility enable resilience catastrophic events.